On-page optimization tools promise a clear path to better rankings, but for local SEO they often create more noise than results. Chasing tool scores can lead to longer, overworked pages that miss the real goal: clarity and conversion. What actually moves the needle is making it easy for search systems to understand the page and easy for users to take action. In this post, we break down where these tools fit, where they don’t, and what to focus on instead.
Table of Contents
Why on-page optimization tools can become “a dog chasing its tail”
Most on-page optimization tools work in a similar way. They scrape what is ranking, often the top pages, then suggest you should beat them by “optimizing” more.
Here is the problem: many of those pages are already overworked. They may be stuffed with keywords, packed with extra words, or built around outdated tactics. When the tool tells you to “do more” than those pages, you can end up repeating the same bad pattern.
And the feedback loop looks like this:
- You run an on-page tool.
- The tool compares you to the top results.
- You add more terms, more headings, and more text to match or exceed.
- You publish a longer page that still does not solve the user’s real need.
- Then you run the tool again and do it again.
That loop does not usually move the needle. It keeps you busy, but it does not improve the page for real searchers or for how modern search systems interpret content.
Where on-page AI does fit: link relevancy
We do use an on-page AI tool, but not for the same reason many people use SurferSEO or Page Optimizer Pro.
We use onpage.ai (by Eric Lancher). Our use case is different. We use it for link relevancy, because it integrates with Google’s natural language AI to help us evaluate how relevant a link source is to a topic.
So we are not using it to force “on-page optimization.” We use it for link thinking. That is a meaningful difference.
Got SEO Questions? Get answers every week at 4pm ET at Hump Day Hangouts. Ask questions ahead of time, or live – just go to: https://semanticmastery.com/hdho (bookmark this!) 10+ years of insights given every week!
Get your checklist to help get better results with GBPs, faster.
The 5 main optimization elements Google scans
When we talk about SEO, we keep coming back to what Google and language models can quickly scan to understand what a page is about.
We call these the main optimization elements. If you get these right, the rest of the content becomes much easier to write. You are building for people between the “signals” that tell search systems what the page topic is.
The main optimization elements are:
- URL
- Titles, including:
- SEO title
- Meta title
- H1 (page or post title)
- Headings (H2s)
- Subheadings (H3s, H4s, H5s, etc.)
- Media and internal links
These are the parts that act like the page’s quick summary. Google finds the page through the URL, then checks the title and headings, then uses supporting parts like media and internal links to confirm the topic.
Optimize the “signals,” then write for humans
Here is our main rule:
- Optimize the main optimization elements so bots and language models can quickly understand the topic.
- Write the paragraphs between those elements for humans, so visitors can understand what they are getting and take the next step.
That means the content between headings should not be written to satisfy an imaginary keyword checklist. It should explain, clearly and briefly, what someone should expect when they request the service.
Let’s use the example from tree trimming. Nobody really wants to read a “3,000 word wall” just to hire a service. They want quick answers. What do you do? How does it work? What do you need from me? How much can I expect to pay? How fast can you come out? Those are human questions.
When we structure the page well and keep the paragraphs focused, users get what they need without the fluff. And search systems still get the clarity they want.
Why 600 words can beat 3,000 words
One of the biggest shifts in modern SEO is that “more words” is no longer automatically better. If your structure makes the page obvious, you often do not need to pad it.
We have seen pages go from around 3,000 words down to about 600 words while still performing well. In some cases, the shorter page can even outperform those long, stuffed pages.
The reason is simple: helpful content is about being efficient. If a page is clear and well organized, it does not need to ramble.
What “efficient content” looks like
- Clear headings that match what people search for.
- Short paragraphs that directly answer the question behind each heading.
- No filler just to add word count.
- Enough detail to set expectations and reduce back-and-forth.
When you do this, you usually improve conversions too. That is the part many teams miss when they focus only on “ranking.”
Site efficiency and the Helpful Content Update
We also connect this approach to Google’s Helpful Content Update. That update is about making content that is more useful and more efficient, not forcing people to sift through unnecessary text.
In our view, Google is looking for shortcuts to understand what the page is about. It checks the main optimization elements first, then reads the surrounding paragraphs to confirm the meaning.
So two ideas matter most:
- Branded location and authority signals
- Site efficiency
Site efficiency means:
- Google and language models can crawl your page easily.
- The page structure clearly communicates the topic.
- Visitors can quickly understand what you offer.
Once that foundation is in place, the rest of your content should focus on the human goal: getting the visitor to call, request a quote, book an appointment, or fill out a form.
When would we even consider using an on-page tool?
We are not saying on-page tools can never help. If you are using them as a checklist for structure, or if you are starting from scratch and want ideas for headings, that can be useful.
But if you are using them to force “over-optimization” like it is the main strategy, that is where we think you get stuck.
For local SEO, we prefer to lead with:
- Clear URL and title signals
- A heading structure that matches search intent
- Short, direct paragraphs between the headings
- Internal links and media that support the topic
- A focus on converting the visitor
FAQ
Do we use SurferSEO or Page Optimizer Pro for local content?
We do not. For most local SEO, we think these tools are overkill and can push teams into over-optimization and long content that does not improve results.
Why do you say these tools can hurt rankings?
They often scrape the top results and then encourage you to exceed them. If those top pages are already over-optimized, you may end up copying the same problems while not improving clarity, usefulness, or conversion.
What do you use instead?
We use onpage.ai, but mainly for link relevancy. We also focus on clean structure and the main optimization elements like the URL, titles, headings, and media and internal links.
How many words should a local service page have?
There is no perfect number. What matters is efficiency. We have seen pages do very well with around 600 words instead of 3,000, as long as the structure is clear and the paragraphs answer what the visitor needs.
What is the main goal of the content between headings?
To convert humans. The main optimization elements help search systems understand the topic, and the paragraph text helps users quickly understand expectations and take action.
Does this align with Google’s Helpful Content Update?
Yes. The Helpful Content Update points toward better, more efficient content. When pages are structured clearly and written to satisfy users, they are easier for Google and language models to interpret.
Final takeaway
If you are in local SEO, stop trying to outrank pages by padding them. We would rather build pages that are clearly structured around the main optimization elements, then use the content to help a real person make a decision.
Optimize for clarity first. Make the site efficient. Then write so visitors know what to do next.
Local SEO resources we recommend
If you want more practical, local-focused guidance beyond tool-based page scoring, our team’s free local toolkit is a great place to start. It’s designed to help you streamline lead-gen workflows and improve things like your Google Business Profile and local link acquisition.
For a step-by-step boost specifically for GBP, grab the GBP cheatsheet—it lays out a proven process for 3-pack results within 90 days.
Want to go deeper with a full operating system for scaling local SEO work? Check out MasterMIND, where agency owners get field-tested SOPs and a structured 12-month curriculum.
And if you prefer watching live Q&A, join our YouTube channel for recurring local SEO episodes (including Hump Day Hangouts).