Knowledge panels look simple, but they’re driven by entity trust, not traditional rankings. When Wikipedia shows up as the source, it’s tempting to think the goal is to “outrank” it—but that misunderstands how panels work. The real opportunity isn’t replacing Wikipedia overnight; it’s building enough clear, verified signals that Google has other trusted sources to rely on over time.
Table of Contents
What a knowledge panel is and why Wikipedia shows up
A knowledge panel is a special result Google shows for entities like people, places, or organizations. It often sits to the right of the search results on desktop and contains a short description, images, and quick facts. For many location-based entities, Google often pulls the short description from Wikipedia and cites Wikipedia as the source.
Wikipedia and Wikidata are easy sources for Google to read and trust. They are publicly visible, consistently formatted, and widely linked. This is why Wikipedia often appears in the panel for parks, neighborhoods, landmarks, and business parks.
Can we replace Wikipedia in the knowledge panel?
In most cases it is not realistic to expect a website to instantly replace Wikipedia inside the knowledge panel. The panel is drawn from a variety of trusted sources, and Wikipedia has a strong track record there. Saying we can “outrank” the panel is a bit misleading because the panel is not the same as the organic ranking box. The panel sits off to the side while organic results still appear in the main list. We can aim to rank number one organically for the term, but that does not remove the panel.
Got SEO Questions? Get answers every week at 4pm ET at Hump Day Hangouts. Ask questions ahead of time, or live – just go to: https://semanticmastery.com/hdho (bookmark this!) 10+ years of insights given every week!
Get your checklist to help get better results with GBPs, faster.
What we can do instead
Rather than focusing only on replacing Wikipedia in the panel, we should focus on building authority so Google has other reliable sources to read. Over time, this can influence what Google displays. Here are practical steps that have real impact.
- Claim or create the official online presence — If the park or region has an official website, make sure it is optimized for the name. Use the name in the page title, headings, and in clear copy on the page. A well-structured official page is the best signal.
- Use structured data — Add schema markup for Place, Landmarks, or LocalBusiness as appropriate. Schema helps search engines understand what the page is about and makes it easier for Google to crawl facts such as address, phone number, and official name.
- Claim Google Business Profile if applicable — If the place can be listed as a Google Business Profile or as a park/place, claim and verify it. GBP entries are a clear signal Google can use in panels for physical locations.
- Build citations on trusted sites — Get mentions and listings on municipal pages, tourism sites, reputable directories, and local news outlets. These third-party mentions help Google confirm facts about the entity.
- Use Wikidata and Wikipedia responsibly — Wikidata is a structured data store that Google reads. If there are errors or missing facts, fixing them on Wikidata with proper references can help. Editing or adding Wikipedia content should follow Wikipedia rules and require reliable sources. Do not create self-promotional content on Wikipedia; instead provide neutral, well-sourced facts.
- Encourage media coverage — Local press, blog posts, or trade coverage that mention the place by name with clear facts will give Google more sources to choose from when assembling the panel.
- Create clear metadata and site content — Make the site’s metadata and page copy concise and factual. If Google finds multiple strong sources that match the same facts, it is more likely to pull other snippets instead of only Wikipedia text.
How organic ranking and knowledge panels relate
A knowledge panel is a separate display element. Even if the panel shows Wikipedia, we can still rank number one in the main organic list for the same search term. That gives users a clear path to our site. In many cases, being the top organic result plus having good structured data and local citations is the most practical win.
If we want the panel to contain our content or to cite our site, we must produce clear, authoritative, and third-party verified information. Panics about “replacing Wikipedia” miss the point. Focus on making our website and other profiles the clearest, most accurate, and most widely cited sources about the place.
Quick checklist to influence a location knowledge panel
- Make an official site page for the park with the exact name in the title and H1.
- Add Place or LocalBusiness schema with address, official name, and links.
- Claim any Google Business Profile or Place entry and keep it updated.
- Get listings on city, county, tourism, and high-quality directory sites.
- Use Wikidata to store facts and link to official sources.
- Pitch local press for articles that include specific facts and the name.
- Monitor the knowledge panel and organic ranks, and keep improving citations.
Common pitfalls to avoid
- Creating promotional or poorly sourced Wikipedia pages. That often gets removed and hurts credibility.
- Relying on a single tactic. You need multiple trusted sources for Google to change what it shows.
- Ignoring structured data. Schema is an easy technical win and should not be skipped.
Where this works best
This approach works best for places that have a clear official identity and can be cited by outside sources. A business park, technology park, or neighborhood that is referenced by city pages, news articles, and business directories is easier to influence. For small or obscure places with no official footprint, Wikipedia may remain the primary signal for a long time.
Is it possible to have our site listed inside the knowledge panel instead of Wikipedia?
It is possible but uncommon. Google pulls from several authoritative sources. If our site becomes one of those trusted sources and is properly structured, Google may include it. This usually takes consistent, repeated signals from official pages, citations, and structured data.
Can we just edit Wikipedia to change the panel content?
Editing Wikipedia can change the text Google pulls, but changes must follow Wikipedia rules and be backed by reliable sources. Self-promotional edits or unsourced claims will be removed. Use Wikipedia carefully and always cite neutral, third-party sources.
Will ranking number one in organic results remove the knowledge panel?
No. The knowledge panel is a separate element that can remain even if we rank first organically. Ranking first is still valuable because it directs users to our site.
Is Wikidata important for influencing the panel?
Yes. Wikidata is a machine-readable source Google uses. Ensuring accurate facts and references in Wikidata helps Google find and verify data about the place.
Final takeaway
Wikipedia is a heavy hitter in knowledge panels, but it is not the only signal Google uses. Instead of trying to “beat” the panel, we should build a clear, official digital footprint that is easy for Google to trust. Claiming profiles, adding structured data, getting third-party mentions, and fixing facts on Wikidata all move the needle. Over time, those efforts can change what appears in the panel or at least make our site the first thing users see in organic search.